Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Black <dragonheart@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: CAcert certificate distribution license to third parties (i.e. distributors like gentoo) | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:04:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201006271102.59463.dragonheart@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] CAcert certificate distribution license to third parties (i.e. distributors like gentoo) by Daniel Black |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 13 December 2009 22:44:05 Daniel Black wrote: |
| 2 | > Recently this got produced as a draft license for parties distributing |
| 3 | > CAcert's root certificate(s) (like us). |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/3PVDisclaimerAndLicence.h |
| 6 | > tml |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > This is still in draft hasn't been discussed in CAcert's policy group yet. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > If you want to follow/contribute to this discussion look for a post to the |
| 11 | > policy list soon. |
| 12 | > https://lists.cacert.org/wws/info/cacert-policy |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > I make no inferences good or bad about this. Mainly because I'm writing |
| 15 | > this with a headache. |
| 16 | > |
| 17 | > Cheers, |
| 18 | > |
| 19 | > Daniel |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Recently Sasha from Fedora has proposed CAcert's root distribution license as |
| 22 | CC-ND. This avoids many complications of the draft proposal above. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | By joining the list you can vote for it. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | the proposal: |
| 27 | https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-policy/2010-06/msg00151.html |
| 28 | |
| 29 | Once registered on this site there is a "send to (your email)" link on the top |
| 30 | right to preserve threading. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ref: http://spreitzer.name/set-the-cacert-root-certificates-free |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Daniel |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |