From: | Ali-Reza Anghaie <ali@×××××××××××.com> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] RE: Portage package security model... |
Date: | Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:21:54 |
Message-Id: | 1013908809.1459.59.camel@damascus.packetknife.com |
1 | Like I suspected there was already something similar but I hadn't found |
2 | it before. So the files/{digests} is part of the equation. And from at |
3 | least one rip in #gentoo it seems signing the packages seems silly to |
4 | some... |
5 | |
6 | Anyhow, thanks... -Ali |
7 | |
8 | -- |
9 | OpenPGP key 53F7FF5F |
10 | -- |
11 | I, the above, promise to use as many global variables, magic |
12 | numbers, gotos, and longjumps as I can, in order to make my |
13 | application code appear more magical. |
14 | -- (My friend JB) |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: Portage package security model... | Daniel Mettler <mettlerd@×××××××××.ch> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: Portage package security model... | Nils Ohlmeier <lists@××××××××.de> |