| 1 |
Il giorno dom, 08/08/2010 alle 03.11 +0300, Markos Chandras ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> We could at least enable that on x86/amd64 dev profiles (since only |
| 3 |
> devs are |
| 4 |
> supposed to use them and they are the most used arches among us) just |
| 5 |
> to get some more |
| 6 |
> feedback and fix the packages before they reach the end users. This |
| 7 |
> will |
| 8 |
> reduce the bug # and make sure that --as-needed is respected in a |
| 9 |
> broader |
| 10 |
> range of packages |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I've set it out on the tinderbox, I can start reporting bugs from |
| 13 |
there... the problem is: _who_ is going to look at them? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You can already deduce a subset of packages not respecting ldflags by |
| 16 |
taking the bugs that I report with forced --as-needed, take out those |
| 17 |
reported for LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed as well: what remains is usually |
| 18 |
stuff that uses filter-ldflags or simply ignores the LDFLAGS variable. |
| 19 |
Not all of them, but some of them for a start. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 23 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives