| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Apr 13, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 20:48 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 8 |
>> Anyway, any objections against moving the current USE_EXPAND out of |
| 9 |
>> make.globals and into base's make.defaults? Those using <=2.0.50* |
| 10 |
>> won't get |
| 11 |
>> any additions (how it is now anyway) and anybody using a stacked |
| 12 |
>> profile |
| 13 |
>> (which requires >=2.0.51) will get whatever is in make.globals |
| 14 |
>> overwritten |
| 15 |
>> with whatever is in make.defaults. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Sounds good to me. Waiting on new portage releases for stuff we want to |
| 18 |
> use in ebuilds kinda sucks, so (up to a point) the more we can move |
| 19 |
> into |
| 20 |
> profiles the better, as far as I'm concerned. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Agreed. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iD8DBQFCXWtmJ0rMK/3OwgsRAjOCAJ0UpDEVomjnctPEa5mtza+MYUZi3ACfagTV |
| 32 |
YxaEZaaVpB7TUz3O1IjeLv8= |
| 33 |
=BePN |
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives