| 1 |
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:00 -0500 |
| 2 |
Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Should we target package versions that aren't stabilized on other |
| 5 |
> architectures yet, so that we'll have an extended testing period |
| 6 |
> before they'll come up for stabilization? That is, can I plan to make |
| 7 |
> gcc-4.5.1 or something the first restabilized version of gcc, go ahead |
| 8 |
> and begin testing it, and be ready for stabilization when toolchain |
| 9 |
> requests it? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'd work on getting it ~mips before you think about stabilizing. ;) Last |
| 12 |
report I got it doesn't build. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What's your target hardware for stabilization? Are we still focusing on SGI |
| 15 |
stuff or moving on to newer platforms? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense |
| 19 |
toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime |
| 20 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives