Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: justin <jlec@g.o>
Subject: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:54:09 +0200
On 23/05/12 14:42, Michael Weber wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> i've looked at the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration to git"
> [1] and want to discuss "testing git-cvsserver" [2].
> 
> There are two proposed scenarios how to migrate the developers write
> access to the portage tree.
> 
> "Clean cut" turns of cvs access on a given and announced timestamp,


I want to see to it gone. +1

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.