Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:06:57
Message-Id: 2915979.scyzOdHmJ5@news.friendly-coders.info
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2
3 > I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2.
4 >
5 Well judging by your EAPI-2, I'd prefer it. Apart from USE-deps, there's
6 been no discussion apart from under your supervision on bugzie.
7 nonfatal? (or w/e it's called.) Who came up with that idea, and why did you
8 ignore the --or-die option that's already been discussed?
9
10 If you want exceptions, try C++ (better than you're currently doing.) This
11 is shellscript.
12
13 I'd like to moot to the Council that we hold off on EAPI-2 profiles, and go
14 with EAPI-1 plus USE-deps and BASH-3.2_p17 (honestly, you thought 4 was
15 ready?!) til we get this mess sorted.
16
17 --
18 #friendly-coders -- We're friendly but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Chip Parker <infowolfe@×××××.com>