| 1 |
On 06/21/2011 08:40 AM, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2011/6/21 Michał Górny<mgorny@g.o>: |
| 3 |
>> Hello, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> As we discussed for a while, the media-sound/ category has grown very |
| 6 |
>> large and it may be a good idea to split it. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Right now, it contains audio players, editing software, converters, |
| 9 |
>> sound systems and a lot of other utilities related to sound. Splitting |
| 10 |
>> that up would make looking up software easier for users (e.g. if I want |
| 11 |
>> to take a look at what audio players we have, I don't need to see all |
| 12 |
>> other programs). |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> What do you think? What new category/-ies do you suggest? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I'd been always against the current classification. It's a bit |
| 17 |
> confusing to me (it's just my -very subjective- view, of course). |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I'd gladly remove the "media-" thing as a whole, and do something like: |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> gfx-viewers |
| 22 |
> gfx-editors |
| 23 |
> gfx-plugins |
| 24 |
> gfx-libs |
| 25 |
> sound-players (and maybe sound-radio) |
| 26 |
> sound-editors |
| 27 |
> sound-plugins |
| 28 |
> sound-libs |
| 29 |
> video-players (and, maybe, only maybe video-tv) |
| 30 |
> video-editors |
| 31 |
> video-plugins |
| 32 |
> video-libs |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I think 'audio' works better than 'sound' for category prefix of |
| 35 |
audio/sound related apps. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Also, leave video-* in media-video/ and media-libs/ They can fit fine |
| 38 |
in there. Plus video-players are multimedia players (they don't play |
| 39 |
back just video, for instance). |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Steve |
Archives