From: | "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound | ||
Date: | Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:32:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 20010923183241.338f93a8.blocke@shivan.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound by Mikael Hallendal |
1 | On 23 Sep 2001 17:14:18 +0200 |
2 | Mikael Hallendal <micke@×××××××××××.se> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than |
5 | > 0.2.5? |
6 | |
7 | I'm assuming this is the case because the test for 0.2.5+ fails in the |
8 | BitchX configure script and the authors website shows 0.2.8 as the most |
9 | recent version. Either way BitchX isn't building for me with 0.2.22. |
10 | |
11 | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
12 | Bruce A. Locke |
13 | blocke@××××××.org |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound | "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@××××××.org> |