Archives
Archives
| From: | Miles Egan <miles@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Spider <spider@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo | ||
| Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:18:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3E9679E0.8040905@caddr.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo by Spider |
||
| 1 | Spider wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I know I'd welcome it, as a far simpler way of installing and keeping my |
| 4 | > celeron running.. But I think it'd require some more portage hacking |
| 5 | > to "make it work", at least the following. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I help manage a linux compute cluster of about 1500 nodes. We run |
| 8 | Redhat. Gentoo isn't even an option without something like kickstart |
| 9 | and binary package support as good as rpm's. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | miles |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo | "Robin H.Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> |