Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:37:47 +0200 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
> | Molle Bestefich wrote:
> | > I noticed that several users have commented with a relevant
> | > complaint: GCC-4.x is required by the ebuild, but no information is
> | > ever conveyed to the end user about this fact.  The ebuild does not
> | > have a dependency on GCC-4.x.
> | 
> | No, it's not. gcc-3.4.x *is* required. That versions (or later) is
> | *stable* everywhere where xine-lib is stable.
> 
> Not true. According to the 2006.0 x86 profile, for example, you're
> required to have ">=sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1". There is no requirement
> that 3.4 be installed.
> 

Yeah, that's not what I've been talking about at all, what's your point?
I was saying that gcc-3.4 and better is stable everywhere where it's
needed. How does it change that 3.3 is dead as a nail in a lamproom door
 and users should switch to something that we actually can support?


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@g.o
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)