1 |
On Saturday 07 November, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:45:23PM -0800, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: |
4 |
> > > > Anyone with better understanding of the licences could help? |
5 |
> > > > Upstream does not answer. |
6 |
> > > Can you list the license files please? I'll poke at them after |
7 |
> > > that. |
8 |
> Files, plural. If each RPM in the blob has separate licenses, we need |
9 |
> to review all of them. |
10 |
|
11 |
This license is the only one I could find in the "Intel Compiler |
12 |
Professional Edition" which is the one tar ball we are thinking of |
13 |
splitting. |
14 |
|
15 |
> Additionally, from the base license: |
16 |
> ] Subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and |
17 |
> any specific ] restrictions which may appear in the Redistributables |
18 |
> text files, Intel grants ] to you a non-exclusive, non-assignable |
19 |
> copyright license to distribute (except ] under an Evaluation License |
20 |
> as specified below) the Redistributables, or any ] portions thereof, |
21 |
> as part of the product or application you developed using the ] |
22 |
> Materials. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Thus, we need to review the "any specific restrictions which may |
25 |
> appear in the Redistributables text files" for problems as well. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
The "Redistributables" seem a bit different in Intel sense, see my |
29 |
post in [1]. I also put the redist file in [2]. |
30 |
|
31 |
> At a first reading, it smells badly. Do you know of any other distro |
32 |
> that is redistribution the files as-is from upstream or other |
33 |
> derivative distributable? |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
We are the only distro having Intel stuff in the repos as far as I know. |
37 |
Most of the big distros have official support but users need to install |
38 |
it from Intel. |
39 |
|
40 |
Thanks for looking at this! |
41 |
|
42 |
[1] http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/69175/ |
43 |
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~bicatali/ |
44 |
-- |
45 |
Sebastien |