| 1 |
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:06:35 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > So are all zero-install-cost metapackages virtuals now? What about, |
| 5 |
> > for instance, kde-base/kde? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Looking at the dependencies of kde-base/kde, it seems like it would |
| 8 |
> be eligible to exhibit the "virtual" property. Perhaps it wouldn't |
| 9 |
> be very useful in this particular case, but it doesn't seem like it |
| 10 |
> would hurt anything either. So, I think it's probably fine to keep |
| 11 |
> the definition as it is and allow things like kde-base/kde to |
| 12 |
> exhibit the "virtual" property. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Then change the name. Call it "zero-install-cost". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives