Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 00:14:18
Message-Id: 4DBCA5B2.7000600@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild by Dale
1 Dale wrote:
2 > I'm a user, tho a lowly one, and even I look in the changelogs from
3 > time to time. I don't even see why this should be discussed. If you
4 > *change* something, but it in the *change* log. If not, maybe the
5 > changelog should be called something else.
6 >
7 > Using the logic that something being removed is not a change, then
8 > adding something is a change either. Adding something is important
9 > and I think something being removed is important too.
10 >
11 > Dale
12 I'm a user, tho a lowly one, and even I look in the changelogs from time
13 to time. I don't even see why this should be discussed. If you
14 *change* something, put it in the *change* log. If not, maybe the
15 changelog should be called something else.
16
17 Using the logic that something being removed is not a change, then
18 adding something is not a change either. Adding something is important
19 and I think something being removed is important too.
20
21 Dale
22
23 :-) :-)
24
25 P. S. Corrected some bad typos. lol I need new glasses and better
26 fingers.