Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
Subject: Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:35:58 +0200
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 12:50 +0300, Petteri Räty a écrit :
> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
> disabling later?

You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly
managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are
for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would
be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face
of the reported like this do we ?

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
Gentoo
Attachment:
signature.asc (Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée)
Replies:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
-- Alec Warner
References:
Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Next by thread:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Previous by date:
Re: [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process
Next by date:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.