Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:07:01 +0200
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> said:
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 08:57:45 Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > > , efficient, known-good solution
> > > that does what you'd expect it to do and replace it with a new
> > > thingy that doesn't provide all the features, is harder to debug
> > > etc. etc.? I just don't see any *advantage* from it apart from
> > > saying "OMG HAZ NEW FEATRUES" :)
> > 
> > one feature of systemd is, that it has an active upstream.
> 
> ... and so does openrc

presumably you are referring to this:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/openrc/

?

Thats great news. Thanks.
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Lars Wendler
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Thilo Bangert
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Mike Frysinger
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Next by thread:
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Previous by date:
Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
Next by date:
Last Rites: dev-python/boostpythongenerator


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.