1 |
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Andrew D Kirch<trelane@×××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Ciaran, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or |
5 |
> PMS) in the first place. This essentially leaves you writing documents |
6 |
> you're requiring for paludis support. As this seems to be mostly a PM |
7 |
> issue, it should be taken elsewhere. To that end, here is a |
8 |
> gentoo-portage-dev mailing list that is more appropriate for minor |
9 |
> process issues such as those brought up below. |
10 |
> I think that ending this discussion here and moving it over to a forum |
11 |
> more appropriate to package manager development would reduce the |
12 |
> temperature around your proposals and get them implemented (as Zac seems |
13 |
> willing to do so). While I realize this is a general purpose mailing |
14 |
> list, it is general purpose, and there is a mailing list specifically |
15 |
> for portage development. |
16 |
|
17 |
I think you are slightly misreading his intent (or I am misreading |
18 |
it). I believe Ciaran is talking about "what gentoo should put in |
19 |
make.defaults such that the user experience doesn't totally suck for |
20 |
this new EAPI3 thing" and provided some ideas. I'm pretty sure |
21 |
whether or not PM foo has implemented these things is a moot point as |
22 |
far as this thread is concerned. |
23 |
|
24 |
-A |
25 |
|
26 |
> |
27 |
> Andrew |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
30 |
>> *SNIP* |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |