Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: split up media-sound/ category
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:14:49
Message-Id: pan.2011.06.21.21.13.51@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: split up media-sound/ category by "Michał Górny"
1 Michał Górny posted on Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:37:46 +0200 as excerpted:
2
3 >> IMO gfx-xxxx looks like some texting/personal shortcut,
4 >> not appropriately professional for a (meta-)distro like gentoo.
5 >
6 > Like in 'media-gfx'? :P
7
8 The initial gfx is rather worse, but yes. Just as the devmanual states
9 about the changelog, package categories should be "proper" English
10 (words). So *wtf* and *gfx* are equally inappropriate. IMO, of course.
11
12 (It's worth noting that the above opinion doesn't extend to individual
13 package names, however. If the authors of a program are fine with
14 calling it the gimp (the gfx tool), or clit (convert-lit, an ebook
15 converter), or whatever, fine with me.)
16
17 --
18 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
19 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
20 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: split up media-sound/ category "Jesús J. Guerrero Botella" <jesus.guerrero.botella@×××××.com>