1 |
Michał Górny posted on Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:37:46 +0200 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> IMO gfx-xxxx looks like some texting/personal shortcut, |
4 |
>> not appropriately professional for a (meta-)distro like gentoo. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Like in 'media-gfx'? :P |
7 |
|
8 |
The initial gfx is rather worse, but yes. Just as the devmanual states |
9 |
about the changelog, package categories should be "proper" English |
10 |
(words). So *wtf* and *gfx* are equally inappropriate. IMO, of course. |
11 |
|
12 |
(It's worth noting that the above opinion doesn't extend to individual |
13 |
package names, however. If the authors of a program are fine with |
14 |
calling it the gimp (the gfx tool), or clit (convert-lit, an ebook |
15 |
converter), or whatever, fine with me.) |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
19 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
20 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |