Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o, scarabeus@g.o
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/libreoffice: ChangeLog libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuild libreoffice-3.5.0.0.ebuild
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:33:11 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/12/2011 05:44 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> scarabeus    11/12/12 17:44:48
> 
> Modified:             ChangeLog Added:
> libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuild Removed:
> libreoffice-3.5.0.0.ebuild Log: Remove miss-named beta0. Add beta1
> with better name (presented as downgrade).
> 
> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha80/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options:
> --force)
> 
> Revision  Changes    Path 1.216
> app-office/libreoffice/ChangeLog
> 
I know it is a bit late but do you think that commit made sense at
that time? It is not the best user experience we can provide when beta
releases appear as downgrades. FWIW beta releases should remain masked
to avoid useless compilations to slow machines instead of digging
through Changelogs to see what happened. Are the beta releases of
libreoffice so critical that force you to keep them in the ~testing tree?

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
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=+H4t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/libreoffice: ChangeLog libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuild libreoffice-3.5.0.0.ebuild
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Last rites: kde-misc/kcheckgmail
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/libreoffice: ChangeLog libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuild libreoffice-3.5.0.0.ebuild
Previous by date:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by date:
Re: Re: estack_{push,pop}: cool new helpers or over engineering?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.