Archives
Archives
| From: | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing | ||
| Date: | Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:47:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAKmKYaCEjjwu-UnY9guBmKWwK+Wtrz49ie_5z=gdm1AUZhcWDg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Anything we do has to be automated to be of any real value. Ideally |
| 3 | > if something goes wrong it should be as detectable as possible. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Yeah, but you'd have to part of that at every developer's box. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Can we just agree that having the tip of the main tree always signed |
| 8 | will be enough for now, and postpone the rest of the discussion until |
| 9 | later? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Cheers, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Dirkjan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |