List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:37:59 +0200 Jakub Moc <email@example.com> wrote:
> | Additionally, it would be nice if these discussions involved
> | concerned arches and were not done ex post in future cases.
> Uh, Jakub, part of the design of the devmanual was that it would be
> possible for the right people to update it to codify existing practice
> without arguments from the peanut gallery who like to claim that
> because they've been getting away with it it's allowed. See also
> conflicting USE flags and static metadata requirement... This isn't a
> change, it's a documentation of how things are.
You still didn't bring in any argument, why am I not surprised? Plus
don't pull in unrelated stuff into this debate. Plus getting devmanual
changed on the fly and using it as a point in discussion five minutes
later is not an acceptable practice for anyone who wants to debate
> You've already wasted too much of other people's time on this. You're
> not getting any more of mine.
Please, take this, your peanut galleries and other junk off-list,
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)