1 |
On 10/12/2011 04:44 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:52:42 +0100 |
3 |
> Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Seems like none of you ever bothered to read the bug about pngcrush |
6 |
>> and what was discussed there. It is getting a little bit of a habit to |
7 |
>> escalate minor problems to flames in Gentoo. So feel free to |
8 |
>> write/say/do whatever you want(maybe add it to system@ set cause you |
9 |
>> all seem to love this package very very much). I am done with this |
10 |
>> thread since you all enjoy spreading flame bites around without even |
11 |
>> spending 1' to read the bug. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I've read this whole thread and found that if we remove your posts then there |
14 |
> would have been no flaming whatsoever. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
I would call baseless claims and accusations flaming. Or an poor attempt |
19 |
of it. |
20 |
|
21 |
Still waiting for an apology from one or two persons involved in this |
22 |
thread, and hwoarang isn't one of them. |