Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:34:32 -0800
Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Сбт, 07/11/2009 в 12:49 -0800, Zac Medico пишет:
>> Peter Volkov wrote:
>>>> We could introduce "noarch" and "~noarch" KEYWORDS, add "noarch" to
>>>> the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct
>>>> unstable users to add "~noarch" to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
>>> Looks like this will not work for all noarch packages. Stardict
>>> dictionary itself is noarch, but it RDEPENDS on stardict package which
>>> is keyworded only on some archs. So we'll be forced either to keyword
>>> stardict on all archs or we need to introduce some new way to work with
>>> such situations.
>> Keywording stardict on all archs doesn't sound reasonable, so I
>> guess we just need to make sure that repoman will allow the noarch
>> keyword even though the dependencies aren't keyworded on all
>> architectures.
> 
> But how will portage handle such situations? Will it allow installation
> of noarch package and pull in *DEPEND only if possible, or will it
> prohibit installation of noarch pkgs with unsatisfied deps? The latter
> will make life harder for tools like eix, I guess.

It should prohibit installation if there are unsatisfied deps. If
you want "optional" dependencies then that will require a syntax
extension with an EAPI bump.
-- 
Thanks,
Zac


References:
[RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Joseph Jezak
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ryan Hill
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Tobias Klausmann
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Peter Volkov
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Peter Volkov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild
Next by date:
RFC: Enable USE="cxx" in base/make.defaults ?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.