Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving unmaintained packages to Sunrise
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:48:58
Message-Id: 4C156E48.7050303@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving unmaintained packages to Sunrise by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
1 On 06/13/10 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
2 > If we want to find a way to not drop the maintainer-needed packages, I'd
3 > prefer we move them to sunset and not to sunrise.
4
5 Agreed.
6
7 If there is a user-maintainer move to sunrise, if there isn't move to
8 sunset.
9
10
11 > As this overlay is
12 > likely to become large, probably "huge", and as it will host security
13 > vulnerable packages, we should evaluate whether we really want to host
14 > it and, if so, what measures to take to protect "distracted users". I
15 > think package masking all the packages put there with links to relevant
16 > bugs might be a first step.
17
18 We introduced a "graveyard" quality level to layman recently that allows
19 for marking such repositories (and a split tree in the future).
20 Quoting the current repositories.dtd:
21
22 [..]
23 quality (core|stable|testing|experimental|graveyard) #REQUIRED
24 [..]
25
26 So Layman can be made handling such a repo specially, say displaying
27 certain warnings.
28
29
30
31 Sebastian