1 |
On 06/13/10 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
2 |
> If we want to find a way to not drop the maintainer-needed packages, I'd |
3 |
> prefer we move them to sunset and not to sunrise. |
4 |
|
5 |
Agreed. |
6 |
|
7 |
If there is a user-maintainer move to sunrise, if there isn't move to |
8 |
sunset. |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
> As this overlay is |
12 |
> likely to become large, probably "huge", and as it will host security |
13 |
> vulnerable packages, we should evaluate whether we really want to host |
14 |
> it and, if so, what measures to take to protect "distracted users". I |
15 |
> think package masking all the packages put there with links to relevant |
16 |
> bugs might be a first step. |
17 |
|
18 |
We introduced a "graveyard" quality level to layman recently that allows |
19 |
for marking such repositories (and a split tree in the future). |
20 |
Quoting the current repositories.dtd: |
21 |
|
22 |
[..] |
23 |
quality (core|stable|testing|experimental|graveyard) #REQUIRED |
24 |
[..] |
25 |
|
26 |
So Layman can be made handling such a repo specially, say displaying |
27 |
certain warnings. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
Sebastian |