Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Nathan Zachary <nathanzachary@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:57:46 -0500
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    On 24/08/10 22:21, Joshua Saddler wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:20100824202126.55dfa8f3@angelstorm
"
      type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200
Christian Faulhammer <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fauli@g.o">&lt;fauli@g.o&gt;</a> wrote:

</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">Hi,

Joshua Saddler <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:nightmorph@g.o">&lt;nightmorph@g.o&gt;</a>:
</pre>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <pre wrap="">The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked
stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc
files.
</pre>
        </blockquote>
        <pre wrap="">
 Is there a list of the needed changes?
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
Read the OpenRC guide, then read all our other guides. That's the list. It will require a line-by-line code scan to figure all this stuff out. Creating such a list would probably take almost as long as actually fixing the docs.
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <font face="Bitstream Vera Sans">I don't think that the
      documentation changes should be a determining factor in switching
      to OpenRC.&nbsp; If we are going to endorse using OpenRC, the more
      relevant issues are the ones regarding its future development.&nbsp;
      The documentation can be updated in due time.&nbsp; Of course, that's
      just my opinion.</font><br>
  </body>
</html>
Replies:
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Richard Freeman
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Joshua Saddler
References:
The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Lars Wendler
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Olivier CrĂȘte
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Thilo Bangert
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Richard Freeman
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Joshua Saddler
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
-- Joshua Saddler
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Next by thread:
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Previous by date:
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Next by date:
Re: Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.