Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 24/08/10 22:21, Joshua Saddler wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20100824202126.55dfa8f3@angelstorm
"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200
Christian Faulhammer <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fauli@g.o"><fauli@g.o></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
Joshua Saddler <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:nightmorph@g.o"><nightmorph@g.o></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked
stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc
files.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Is there a list of the needed changes?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Read the OpenRC guide, then read all our other guides. That's the list. It will require a line-by-line code scan to figure all this stuff out. Creating such a list would probably take almost as long as actually fixing the docs.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<font face="Bitstream Vera Sans">I don't think that the
documentation changes should be a determining factor in switching
to OpenRC. If we are going to endorse using OpenRC, the more
relevant issues are the ones regarding its future development.
The documentation can be updated in due time. Of course, that's
just my opinion.</font><br>
</body>
</html>
|
|
