| 1 |
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 05:00:04PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote: |
| 2 |
> > What about a PORTDIR_OVERLAY using some network file system? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Of course I could run a |
| 5 |
> own rsync mirror tree, but then it wouldn't be intergrated. Basicly I |
| 6 |
> want to do as little changes as possible on the machines, and having a |
| 7 |
> own rsync tree would be the easiest way to maintain it as you still just |
| 8 |
> do |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> emerge sync |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> on the remote machines (once make.conf has been updated with the correct |
| 13 |
> rsync mirror settings). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Two other ideas: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
1) Work with a PORTDIR_OVERLAY and distribute it via rsync. Do some trick |
| 18 |
(alias, wrapper-script, whatever) to make the other machines always sync |
| 19 |
both (portage and overlay). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
2) Make your own portage mirror (not official) and let the same cron job |
| 22 |
that does the rsync for portage also copy your overlay into the portage |
| 23 |
tree. Use this as the rsync mirror for your other machines. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
HTH, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Patrick |
Archives