1 |
On 06/10/2012 10:19 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:54:21 -0400 |
3 |
> Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> For libraries, if possible, try splitting gtk2 and gtk3 support into |
5 |
>> different slots (see net-libs/webkit-gtk for an example; the |
6 |
>> gtk2-based versions have -r2xx revision numbers and go in slot 2, |
7 |
>> while the gtk3-based versions have -r3xx revision numbers and go in |
8 |
>> slot 3). |
9 |
> |
10 |
> That is not what revisions are for. If you can't solve a problem |
11 |
> properly using existing mechanisms, ask for new ones. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
I disagree. This is a proper solution, cause we use SLOTs and on top of |
15 |
that revision numbers to make a difference for the ebuild name. |
16 |
|
17 |
Another solution would be to include the SLOT in the ebuild name, but I |
18 |
see more potential problems with that. |