Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Cort <linuxgeek@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:24:49
Message-Id: 3b09e8e90610040621p62d4a33n559fbaf744e9b4ee@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide by "Kevin F. Quinn"
1 > The "minority" arches like mips, sparc etc seem to get along quite happily.
2
3 Not the "minority" arches like m68k, s390, alpha, ...
4
5 > > - Reduce the number of projects by eliminating the dead, weak,
6 > > understaffed, and unnecessary projects
7 >
8 > Weak: Be more specific. What are the "weak" projects, and why?
9
10 Projects that don't achieve anything, have no goals, and don't show
11 any promise of doing anything productive.
12
13 > Understaffed: this issue manifests itself as a project being slow to
14 > update. However the only place this is an issue is for security issue
15 > management. Another solution to under-staffing is to reduce
16 > expectations.
17
18 The more we reduce expectations, the more it will hurt users. We
19 should be raising expectations and following through.
20
21 > Unnecessary: again, be more specific. What are the "unnecessary"
22 > projects, and why?
23
24 Projects that aren't needed to further Gentoo and are not helpful to
25 users or developers.
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>