| 1 |
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: |
| 4 |
>> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 5 |
>> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. |
| 6 |
>> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then |
| 7 |
>> >> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out |
| 8 |
>> >> of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that urgent in order to |
| 9 |
>> >> justify the significant breakage of portage tree. |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > you're assuming the breakage was intentional. i also wouldn't really |
| 12 |
>> > describe it as "significant", but that's just quibbling over an |
| 13 |
>> > insignificant aspect. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> It's intentional not to revert the change, it's significant because it |
| 16 |
>> involve a number of significant packages like icu, vim and boost, some |
| 17 |
>> of them already marked stable (from a fast grep from the one mentioned |
| 18 |
>> in the previous posts). |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> you've identified the broke things. so fix them. |
| 21 |
> -mike |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
wanna give me commit access for few hours? |
| 24 |
I've already done mass changes to the tree when introducing |
| 25 |
virtual/mysql seem something doable the same way. |
Archives