| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:20:09 +0530 |
| 5 |
> Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Allowing him to proxy in a council meeting is both disallowed |
| 7 |
> > (non-gentoo devs cannot be on the council) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Please point to the rule that says that a non-developer cannot be on |
| 10 |
> the Council, and please point to the rule that says that a Council |
| 11 |
> member cannot appoint a non-developer as their proxy. I see no mention |
| 12 |
> of either in GLEP 39, which only restricts voting of Council members to |
| 13 |
> developers, and only restricts proxies to not having one person with |
| 14 |
> multiple votes. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Oh so you'll argue semantics now? The spirit of the rule is |
| 18 |
excessively clear. No non-gentoo-developer can be a member of council |
| 19 |
-- permanent, temporary, or proxy. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If a council member can't find a gentoo developer to be their proxy, |
| 22 |
that says a lot about the council member. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
In any case, discussing this with you is completely m00t given my past |
| 25 |
experiences with discussions with you. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
Archives