Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:37:39
Message-Id: 1268383017.6834.14.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review by Ben de Groot
1 On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
2 > On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
4 > >> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
5 > >
6 > > I suggest reading my comments...
7 >
8 > Unless I missed something, you didn't make any comments on this
9 > thread.
10
11 The subthread got renamed to more fit its purpose.
12
13 > If you mean the thread you started that tangentially took off from this
14 > one, about eselect profile improvements: I support that proposal,
15 > but it will take some time to get implemented. Is anyone already
16 > working on that?
17 >
18 > In the meantime I see no reason for that to halt or postpone the
19 > current desktop profile improvements as prepared by Theo.
20
21 I argued that it's a bad idea to add yet more profiles, when we could
22 avoid that (while even improving things additionally).
23
24 But I guess I'll have to bring some direct points why I think
25 implementing the alternative as I described ASAP is better than ever
26 doing this gnome/kde subprofile thing:
27
28 * The split desktop profile plan retroactively modifies 2008.0 and 10.0
29 profiles. Not a good thing for obvious reasons. (Of course the
30 subprofiles could also be added together with a new release, as proposed
31 for the alternative idea)
32 * Adding yet more subprofiles, increasing repoman and pcheck time,
33 possibly confusing users (migration things; changing USE flags in a
34 perceived stable release profile leading to unexpected --newuse
35 triggering, etc)
36 * Making it harder to get both GNOME and KDE things out of a profile
37 (though the common things in desktop profile right now is quite
38 suboptimal for GNOME)
39 * Putting the problem of suboptimal subprofiles handling under the
40 carpet again, greatly reducing the motivation for people to work on the
41 alternative better proposal
42
43 --
44 Mart Raudsepp
45 Gentoo Developer
46 Mail: leio@g.o
47 Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies