Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
Am 15.03.2012 00:37, schrieb Greg KH:
> Not really, I don't think we support systems without udev anymore,
> right? And we get away with a lot of these different "options" at
> compile time, which makes it easier than what Debian has to handle, so
> perhaps it's not a fair comparison.
Sure Gentoo does support such systems...
# equery g virtual/dev-manager
* Searching for dev-manager in virtual ...
* dependency graph for virtual/dev-manager-0
`-- virtual/dev-manager-0 amd64
`-- sys-fs/udev-171-r5 (sys-fs/udev) amd64
`-- sys-apps/busybox-1.19.3-r1 (sys-apps/busybox) amd64 [mdev]
`-- sys-fs/devfsd-1.3.25-r9 (sys-fs/devfsd) [missing keyword]
`-- sys-fs/static-dev-0.1 (sys-fs/static-dev) amd64
`-- sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin-9.0 (sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin)
[missing keyword]
[ virtual/dev-manager-0 stats: packages (6), max depth (1) ]
/martin
|
|
