Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ssuominen@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:59:48
Message-Id: 20120311190024.52c9a3a8@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 by Samuli Suominen
1 On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:35:36 +0200
2 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 03/11/2012 07:33 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
5 > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:28:41PM -0800, Luca Barbato wrote:
6 > >> On 3/10/12 6:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
7 > >>> neither the genkernel nor dracut docs have specific instructions
8 > >>> about
9 > >>
10 > >> I guess we could pour more effort in getting dracut more easy to
11 > >> use and/or try to figure out which are the items that should be
12 > >> moved to / and fix the remaining ones...
13 > >
14 > > I highly discourage moving more things to /. If you google for
15 > > things like, "case for usr merge", "understanding bin split", etc,
16 > > you will find much information that is very enlightening about
17 > > the /usr merge and the reasons for the /bin, /lib, /sbin -> /usr/*
18 > > split.
19 >
20 > Indeed. I thought we got past this already and started moving things
21 > to /usr [1][2]
22 >
23 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/398081
24 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/403073
25
26 I've just reported executables which are broken without /usr mounted.
27 Some devs moved them to /usr, others moved libraries to /.
28
29 --
30 Best regards,
31 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature