| 1 |
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 2 |
> El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: |
| 3 |
> > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > From my point of view, I would prefer to: |
| 7 |
> > > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to |
| 8 |
> > > keep bluez keyworded. |
| 9 |
> > > 2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywording |
| 10 |
> > > libcap-ng and other to check bluez works ok with it asking arch team to |
| 11 |
> > > unmask that USE flag if possible. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > There's nothing preventing you from already doing this. package.use.mask |
| 15 |
> > is something package maintainers themselves should be looking after for |
| 16 |
> > their packages. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Regards, |
| 19 |
> > Petteri |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> OK, thanks a lot :-D |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The problem is that hppa team seems to not allow others than they to |
| 26 |
edit their package.use.mask :-/, is there any special reason for it? |
Archives