Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:17:41 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> In one of them, removal of the old assignment statement had simply
> been forgotten [1]. For the other two, the EAPI had been assigned by
> an eclass [2], which we consider illegal anyway.
...and yet people do it. That and the violations of the HOMEPAGE rule
tell you a lot about what happens when something is made syntactically
valid but supposedly not legal.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
|
|
