| 1 |
On 9/21/2006, "Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>> However the behaviour displayed in this list, and in particular this |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
>> thread are downright embarassing. I used to be proud of being a gentoo |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
>> user and following a group of dedicated and clever developers. Now I |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
>> just want to find a quick and easy way to get rid of it. You have had |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
>> your antics displayed to the world via a thrashing on slashdot, and |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
>> most of you thoroughly deserve the public outing. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
>> Its time you people had a good look at yourselves. Start behaving like |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
>> adults, not children fighting over the toys in the sandpit. You make it |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
>> hard to promote gentoo when you are arguing over the wording of people |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
>> announcing a new project. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
>> Nick. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
>Recall that the majority of developers barely respond on this list and |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
>just *develop*; I wouldn't suggest lumping everyone in that category; |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
>although I'm sure I fall into it from time to time. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Ahh thats a fair point indeed. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
>-- |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives