Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:03:22 +0200
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
>> MPlayer has a psychological issue with 1.0 versioning, still 1.0.live 
>> correctly isn't higher than 1.0
> No, it is not.

For mplayer it is correct. I'm MPlayer upstream as well. I do know.

> In the -scm approach this means:
> trunk = -scm
> 4.1 branch = -4.1-scm

so you'll be oblivious of changes needed inside the ebuild and you won't 
know what you merged last time you issued an emerge =foo-scm (that by 
itself it is a problem, since it is ambiguous)

> With your approach, we would have to fix the version after every 4.1.x 
> release. That sounds awful, tbh. So:

No that enforce people update the deps or at least gives one more reason 
to do. Keep in mind that -9999, -scm ebuild or .live templates aren't 
for public consumption.

> trunk = .live

nope it would resolve as foo_pre1 -> meaningless.

> 4.1 branch = 4.1.1.live (before 4.1.1 has been released)

correct, you can keep tracking 4.1.1, have interim snapshot pushed in 
portage to ~ if you are confident about them.

> 4.1 branch = 4.1.2.live (before 4.1.2 has been released)
> 4.1 branch = 4.1.3.live (before 4.1.3 has been released)

same reasoning.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Bernd Steinhauser
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Fernando J. Pereda
References:
A few questions to our nominees
-- Piotr JaroszyƄski
Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Luca Barbato
Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Marius Mauch
Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Ryan Hill
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Luca Barbato
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Santiago M. Mola
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Luca Barbato
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
-- Bernd Steinhauser
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
Next by thread:
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
Previous by date:
Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
Next by date:
Extending -scm with upstream revision awareness


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.