1 |
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:45:29 -0500 |
2 |
Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
5 |
> > It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are |
6 |
> > already available. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> So, if bugs are being fixed why is there a need to fix something that |
9 |
> isn't broken with regards to a policy _needed_ to enforce this |
10 |
> action? Are bugs being ignored or RESOLVED, WONTFIX? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Hypothetically, if there was such a policy and there was 100's of |
13 |
> bugs filed with patches (maintainers should handle the patches |
14 |
> anyway) |
15 |
|
16 |
"Should" being the keyword here. Also assumes that all packages are |
17 |
actually maintained. I guess the wording of the original request should |
18 |
have been more like "is anyone against QA fixing packages that ignore |
19 |
LDFLAGS?". |
20 |
|
21 |
Marius |