| 1 |
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 23:48 +0200, Jeroen Roovers a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:22:13 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > We are working on a proper explanation targetted to devs of this. I'm |
| 6 |
> > sorry for the inconvenience caused. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> How large of a change to the tree will this involve? Is it a small |
| 9 |
> number of packages that need to be fixed through the ebuilds right now? |
| 10 |
> will that number grow? Will you notify package maintainers of these |
| 11 |
> changes? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Apparently not, it's not that the change is complicated but I (and the |
| 14 |
rest of the gnome herd) would rather have an upfront information about |
| 15 |
any kind of changes to our ebuilds than discovering these through |
| 16 |
gentoo-commits... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > For the moment you can find our own documentation here: |
| 20 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/techdocs.xml |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Where did you document D -> ED? Can you briefly describe what it does? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I'd also like to know why this cannot be handled by the usual D with |
| 25 |
package manager support, this would save a lot of changes to ebuilds |
| 26 |
(like the python abi stuff that still has no documentation afaik). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I sincerely want to see progress in the way we handle prefix, python |
| 29 |
abis and all the cool stuff that is still in preparation, but let's do |
| 30 |
it in a way to makes every dev aware of it (sending a mail to |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev-announce for example), thanks. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 35 |
Gentoo |
Archives