Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:02:10
Message-Id: 20091216084840.GE21795@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory? by Peter Volkov
1 On 16-12-2009 09:29:07 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
2 > В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет:
3 > > Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support make the
4 > > use of that support mandatory or optional?
5 >
6 > I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there is
7 > no need to bother and create illusion that it does.
8
9 Does your no mean mandatory or optional?
10
11 > > (I can post all the answers to the Prefix quiz)
12 >
13 > I think this is good idea in any case. Could you post this (on -core, of
14 > course)?
15
16 I'll remove all the bits from the quiz that are (no longer) relevant,
17 and then post them, and their answers. I don't see much secret in the
18 answers, or do recruiters want to use some of the questions for future
19 quizzes?
20
21
22 --
23 Fabian Groffen
24 Gentoo on a different level

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory? Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>