| 1 |
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:50 -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > < trelane> ciaranm: I want Paludis to fail. It's unhealthy (or at least |
| 4 |
> > the loudest and most visible of it's devs are) for Gentoo. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > < trelane> lets be VERY clear on that point. So long as Paludis, and |
| 7 |
> > the culture it creates are unhealthy for Gentoo I want it to fail. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > < trelane> ciaranm: that's put in a manner that seems to be a somewhat |
| 10 |
> > knee-jerk reaction. It should be clear that opposing you and everything |
| 11 |
> > you do was an initiative I started only after careful consideration. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Ciaran, you are killing Gentoo. You wrote a demonstrably error prone |
| 16 |
> GLEP 39, then tried to exploit it to ram through GLEP 55, and you got |
| 17 |
> caught. You've created a huge amount of red tape, needless bickering |
| 18 |
> argument, and have utterly hamstrung every council ever convened. |
| 19 |
> Ciaran, you will not be doing this again. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
Actually, GLEP39 was written by Grant and Ciaran, and it was voted on by |
| 22 |
the entire developer community (I don't recall in which order these |
| 23 |
happened, but certainly it was not Ciaran who approved it). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
--- snip --- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I am wearing my userrel hat here. I don't see anything here that |
| 28 |
contributes to the discussion --- it looks like a personal attack and a |
| 29 |
threat to me. As Jorge stated a day or so ago, please stop this now. |
| 30 |
You may consider this to be a final warning. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Andrew D Kirch |
| 34 |
> Funtoo.org |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> PS: Ciaran, Thank you for comparing me to Rush Limbaugh, I consider it a |
| 38 |
> compliment. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Regards, |
| 41 |
Ferris |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 45 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |
Archives