Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-db/libiodbc: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:49:44
Message-Id: 20290.49083.747083.918115@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-db/libiodbc: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog by Samuli Suominen
1 >>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
2
3 >> About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use
4 >> "MAKEOPTS +=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild)
5 >> instead or it should be avoided for some reason.
6
7 > += wasn't allowed because it isn't compatible with bash-3.1 (and
8 > earlier) if I remember correctly
9
10 This is almost right: The += operator was introduced with bash 3.1,
11 so previously it couldn't be used in the tree because compatibility
12 with 3.0 was required.
13
14 > but that ship has long sailed and += syntax is used all over the
15 > tree (and by the package manager itself!)
16
17 > so feel free :)
18
19 It's "officially" allowed since more than two years ago:
20 <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091109-summary.txt>
21
22 Ulrich