Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
Subject: Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:02:16 -0600
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:03:13 -0600
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
> 
> > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> > stabilization)?
> > 
> > I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for
> > testing purposes :-/
> 
> Grub is the only blocker.  I don't want to unmask something that makes
> people's systems unbootable.

Okay, I'm bringing up a dual-boot system this weekend.  If I can get it
to fail I'll have something to debug.  If not, I'm just going to make grub
die on amd64 when 4.6 is used.  So, wish me bad luck. :D


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
About gcc-4.6 unmasking
-- Pacho Ramos
Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking
Next by thread:
Re: Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking
Previous by date:
Re: btrfs status and/was: preserve_old_lib
Next by date:
Re: preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.