| 1 |
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:03:13 -0600 |
| 2 |
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are |
| 8 |
> > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near |
| 9 |
> > stabilization)? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for |
| 12 |
> > testing purposes :-/ |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes |
| 15 |
> people's systems unbootable. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Okay, I'm bringing up a dual-boot system this weekend. If I can get it |
| 18 |
to fail I'll have something to debug. If not, I'm just going to make grub |
| 19 |
die on amd64 when 4.6 is used. So, wish me bad luck. :D |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
fonts, gcc-porting |
| 24 |
toolchain, wxwidgets |
| 25 |
@ gentoo.org |
Archives