Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: Rewriting bash-completion.eclass
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:27:12 +0200
>>>>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:

> I think the way to go would be to reimplement it completely. Maybe
> just put dobashcomp() and newbashcomp() functions in eutils (to not
> collide) and deprecate bash-completion.eclass?

I'd rather keep this in a separate bash-completion-2.eclass.
We shouldn't start moving all do* and new* functions from other
eclasses to eutils, but keep it somewhat modular.

Ulrich


References:
Rewriting bash-completion.eclass
-- Michał Górny
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Rewriting bash-completion.eclass
Next by thread:
Re: Rewriting bash-completion.eclass
Previous by date:
Last rites for app-accessibility/speakup-utils
Next by date:
Re: RFC: devqawarn()?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.