Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:03:19 +0200
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
> Looks useful.  Wasn't aware that a bundle was something other than a tarball.
>
> We'll probably need to spell out the preferred process in the docs,
> and reference it frequently in communications.  Otherwise you'll get
> quite a few clones instead.
>
> It appears that devs will have to add the remote for the live
> repository after they've cloned the bundle - otherwise they'll just
> keep pulling from the bundle which isn't all that convenient.

I think you still misunderstand. As I understand Robin, we wouldn't
even offer up a clone of the full-history bundle, it would only be
offered as a normal download. The default workflow is cloning from the
shallow version, which will obviously give you the desired remote.

Cheers,

Dirkjan


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
References:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Aaron W. Swenson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.