From: | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] media-fonts/droid licensing: should fonts include Apache license in tarball? |
Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:26:54 |
Message-Id: | 1219152343.8480.74.camel@camobap |
1 | Hello. |
2 | |
3 | There are droid fonts package in the tree. Author states that they are |
4 | apache licensed [1] (supposedly similar to google's android sdk) but |
5 | license itself is not included in the package (only .ttf files are |
6 | there). Should we RESTRICT="mirror" in such case or it's safe to drop |
7 | such restriction? |
8 | |
9 | [1] http://damieng.com/blog/2007/11/14/droid-sans-mono-great-coding-font |
10 | |
11 | Thank you for any hints, |
12 | -- |
13 | Peter. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: media-fonts/droid licensing: should fonts include Apache license in tarball? | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> |