Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:09:14 -0700
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are
> >> a lot as I have seen running:
> >> grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v
> >> eutils
> >>
> >> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when
> >> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise
> >> this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in
> >> the future :-/
> >
> > Maybe we should make eutils inheritance implicit so all ebuilds get epatch
> > and friends automatically. Is there really that much overhead? Or am I
> > missing something obvious?
>
> Do you mean in EAPI 5? We're already planning to include epatch, as part
> of the epatch_user thing.
I did. That's awesome, thanks.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
|
|
