| 1 |
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:09:14 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 05/23/2012 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are |
| 9 |
> >> a lot as I have seen running: |
| 10 |
> >> grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v |
| 11 |
> >> eutils |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when |
| 14 |
> >> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise |
| 15 |
> >> this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in |
| 16 |
> >> the future :-/ |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Maybe we should make eutils inheritance implicit so all ebuilds get epatch |
| 19 |
> > and friends automatically. Is there really that much overhead? Or am I |
| 20 |
> > missing something obvious? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Do you mean in EAPI 5? We're already planning to include epatch, as part |
| 23 |
> of the epatch_user thing. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I did. That's awesome, thanks. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
fonts, gcc-porting |
| 30 |
toolchain, wxwidgets |
| 31 |
@ gentoo.org |
Archives