Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 06/27/10 17:04, Markos Chandras wrote:
[snip]
> Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they can't keep
> up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64 do, I still
> think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable tree which I
> doesn't make sense to me after all.
>
> Thoughts?
>
I see two scenarios - either we get the "slow" arches enough cpu- and
manpower, or we remove their stable keywords.
If possible I think we should try to keep stable keywords. So how can we
help? I'm not sure how I could help e.g. PPC - I don't have any hardware
I can test on, and I'm not aware of remotely accessible dev boxen.
So - how can we improve this situation?
|
|
