Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200
>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote:

> On Sat, 12 May 2012 19:57:07 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:

>> > The current workaround for this is to use EXTRA_EMAKE from ebuild,
>> > but I find this rather ugly (if not even forbidden by some PMS
>> > magic?)
>> 
>> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't mentioned by the PMS. Do all package managers
>> support this variable? Portage does since 2004 at least.

> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use
> variable for users who need to pass something specific to make.

You are right, of course. (And this had been clarified before:
<http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_3d25b75236fe4d1e8008998e14fea164.xml>)

I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then:

   eclass/bsdmk.eclass
   eclass/python.eclass
   eclass/scons-utils.eclass
   dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild
   dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild
   dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild
   dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild
   dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild
   dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild
   gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild
   net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild
   sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild
   sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild

Ulrich


Replies:
Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
-- Duncan
References:
Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
-- Samuli Suominen
Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
-- Michał Górny
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
Next by thread:
Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
Previous by date:
Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
Next by date:
Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.