| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
AllenJB wrote: |
| 5 |
> Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. We could move the |
| 8 |
>>> 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category (eselect |
| 9 |
>>> itself would stay in app-admin). |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Opinions? |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> I hate package moves, so is it really *really* necessary? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> I have to agree. app-admin is hardly among the largest categories. |
| 17 |
> Perhaps we should consider splitting up the 400 odd packages in |
| 18 |
> kde-base (kde-graphics, kde-admin, kde-games, etc) =P |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> As for app-admin-eselect, I'd favor tags over increasing the |
| 21 |
> category levels, tho I'm not |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
the three-levels-category was an example. |
| 24 |
the realistic approach I proposed is splitting app-admin in many |
| 25 |
two-level categories: |
| 26 |
+ admin-eselect |
| 27 |
+ admin-sysconf |
| 28 |
+ admin-www |
| 29 |
+ admin-apache |
| 30 |
... |
| 31 |
as it usually has been done in such cases. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
- -- |
| 35 |
Federico Ferri (mescalinum) |
| 36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 38 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkocHNoACgkQV/B5axfzrPsCzgCeJZknEWRV1o2SjPpPc9HJ0k1u |
| 41 |
bUoAnRygFK/mRPfAguutyUmZWssnPyXh |
| 42 |
=hZFu |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives